David Stewart Bachrach
|
Review of Jonathan Phillips,
Holy Warriors: A Modern History of the Crusades. New
York: Random
House, New York, 2009. Pp. xxv, 434. ISBN 978-1-4000-6580-6.
|
Students of the European crusading movement have benefitted over the
past sixty years from a long tradition of overarching narratives.[1]
The eminent crusade historian Jonathan Phillips (Univ. of London)
enters this already dense mix with Holy Warriors, which seeks
to connect medieval concepts of crusading and holy war to modern
notions of crusade and jihad. Phillips conventionally
begins his study with Pope Urban II's preaching of the crusade in
1095 and concludes in the present with a brief discussion of the
implications of the film
Kingdom of Heaven.[2]
The
geographical scope of the study includes not only the eastern shores
of the Mediterranean, but also crusading ventures in the Iberian
Peninsula, the Baltic, North Africa, Asia Minor, and the Balkans.
Holy Warriors is organized largely
chronologically in twelve chapters, with a brief introduction and
conclusion. Chapters 1, 4, 6, and 7 recount the first four major
crusade campaigns. In the first chapter, Phillips takes the reader
from Urban's sermon at Clermont in November 1095 up to the capture
and sack of Jerusalem in July 1099. In chapter 4, he discusses the
crusading efforts authorized by Pope Eugenius following the fall of
the crusader state Edessa to the Muslim ruler Zengi in 1144. Until
recently, the Second Crusade has received comparatively little
attention from historians, and this chapter provides a good
synthesis of recent scholarship.
The campaigns of 1147-48 took place in three widely divergent
theaters. Phillips first describes the origins of the expedition of German crusaders against the West Pomeranian seaport city of Stettin
on the Baltic, a farcical undertaking since its inhabitants had long
since converted to Christianity. Turning to Asia Minor and the
Levant, he highlights the role of the Cistercian abbot, Bernard of
Clairvaux, who preached the crusade in Germany. The campaign to aid
the Latin principalities along the Levantine coast was led by King
Conrad III of Germany and Louis VII of France, the latter
accompanied by his wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine. Phillips provides a
lively description of the struggles endured by both royal armies and
the ultimate failure of the crusaders' siege of Damascus in 1148.
The Iberian theater of the Second Crusade receives the most thorough
treatment, with close attention to the capture of Lisbon and the
concurrent efforts of Genoese, Catalan, and Castilian crusaders to
take Almeria and Tortosa. The discussion of this latter campaign is
particularly welcome given its general neglect in most broad surveys
of the Crusades.
Chapter 6 focuses on Saladin and King Richard I of England, whose
achievements and personalities have dominated both popular and
scholarly accounts of the Third Crusade. As in most earlier
discussions of this conflict, the participation of Emperor Frederick
I's large German army gets comparatively little notice. Phillips
also relegates King Philip II of France to a minor role during the
first months of the campaign. The bulk of the chapter concerns
Richard's two-year campaign against Saladin, which culminated in a
negotiated truce rather than the capture of Jerusalem by the English
king.
Chapter 7 concentrates on the misadventures that culminated in the
sack of Constantinople by a crusading army in 1204 and the
subsequent establishment of the Latin Empire of Byzantium. Phillips
absolves any individual of a premeditated plan to impose western
rule over the Greek empire. Rather, he argues that the unrealistic
results of negotiations between the northern French barons and their
Venetian counterparts left the French barons having to pay off an
enormous debt when only a third of the envisioned crusaders appeared
at Venice for transport to the East. Phillips then sketches the
choices made by the leaders of the crusade that led, fatefully, to
their siege of Constantinople.
Chapters 2, 3, and 5 treat the Latin states in the East and their
Muslim opponents. Phillips draws on Christian and Muslim sources to
present illuminating portraits of crucial players in the development, expansion, and finally reduction of the
Latin principalities: the Sunni legal scholar al-Sulami of Damascus
and the Muslim courtier Usama Ibn Munqidh in chapter 2, Queen
Melisende of Jerusalem in chapter 3, and the couplet of Saladin and
King Baldwin IV of Jerusalem in chapter 5.
Chapters 8-10 take up various crusades over
the course of the thirteenth century. Chapter 8 deals with: the
Albigensian Crusade, directed against heretics in southern France;
the introduction of the Inquisition as a tool to root out heresy;
the myths and realities of the children's crusade of 1212;
crusading in the Baltic region; and the Fourth Lateran Council
(1215) and its summons to a renewed crusade. In chapter 9, Phillips
intertwines narratives of the Fifth Crusade (1218-21), directed
toward Egypt, and the first decades of the reign of Frederick II,
who ultimately regained control of Jerusalem for Christendom through
a settlement negotiated with the sultan al-Kamil. The chapter ends
with a brief discussion of the barons' crusade (1239-41). Chapter 10
examines the crusading efforts of King Louis IX of France,
especially his expedition to Damietta (1248-54) and subsequent
invasion of North Africa (1270). Phillips pairs King Louis with the
mamluke Baibars, who rose from a slave soldier in Egypt to dominate
the Levant by his death in 1277.
Chapters 11 and 12 investigate the persistence of crusading
into the early modern period and its echoes in the modern
era. In chapter 11, Phillips details the suppression of the Templar
order by King Philip IV of France, the evolution of crusading into a
"chivalric" exercise during the late fourteenth century, the rise of
Ottoman Turkey as the dominant Muslim power in the eastern
Mediterranean and Balkans, and the implications of crusading thought
for European conquests in the New World. The twelfth and final
chapter, aptly entitled "New Crusaders: From Sir Walter Scott to
Osama bin Laden and George W. Bush," moves from the disrepute of
crusading during the Enlightenment to its renewal during the
European conquests in the Middle East in the nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries.
The work features a substantial, but not overwhelming, scholarly
apparatus of endnotes, bibliography, and index, as well as several
useful maps and images. Given the volume's primary concentration
on major campaigns and leaders of the crusading era, the
bibliography is heavily weighted toward political history. English
and French language scholarship predominates; works in Spanish,
Italian, or German are less in evidence.
Especially welcome in the book is the vivid portrait of the
strong-willed, powerful, yet enigmatic Queen Melisende. On the
whole, Phillips rarely takes sides in the many scholarly
controversies over particular crusading episodes. An exception is
his treatment of the Fourth Crusade, where he relieves the
Venetians of responsibility for the sack of Constantinople. In
general, however, little in the book will seem controversial or
novel to crusade historians.
A couple relatively minor points require correction. Phillips
accepts the propagandistic claim of Latin writers that the
crusaders' horses died en masse during the march through Anatolia in
1097, and that they rode oxen, while dogs pulled baggage carts (18).
This yields a picturesque but wildly misleading impression of the
campaign against the forces of Kilij Arslan, ruler of the sultanate
of Rum. Another recurrent distraction is Phillips's translation of
miles as "knight." The Latin word actually denotes
professional fighting men equipped with warhorses, body armor,
shields, and swords. Only a small minority of them were of the
juridical class sometimes denoted by knighthood; most did not even
own their horses or equipment. Finally, military historians will
balk ay Phillips's claim, in discussing King Guy of Jerusalem's
decision to fight the battle at Hattin in 1187, that honor demanded
his aggressive action (121). In fact, strongly influenced by the
fifth-century Roman author Flavius Vegetius's military handbook (Epitoma
rei militaris), military doctrine of the crusading era saw
battles and battle-seeking strategies as last resorts. The author himself makes this very point when discussing Richard Lionheart's
tactics and strategy during the Third Crusade (139).
In sum, this highly readable account of the crusading movement
provides a useful introduction to the main campaigns and some of
their more colorful participants. It will be a solid textbook for
undergraduate courses on the crusades or general surveys of the
Middle Ages.
The
University of New Hampshire
bachrach@cisunix.unh.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|