
Grant W. Jones |
Review of James Kirby Martin, ed., Ordinary
Courage: The Revolutionary Adventures of Joseph Plumb Martin.
3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008. Pp. xx,
199. ISBN 978-1-4051-7706-1. |
Joseph Plumb Martin served as a private soldier
in the Continental Army for eight years (1776-83), with one hiatus
during the winter of 1776-77. Born in 1760, he was raised by his
maternal grandparents on their Connecticut farm from age six. He was
fourteen at the time of Lexington and Concord. Inspired by the
rage militaire directly following the first successful clash of
arms with the British invader, Martin decided to join the militia.
However, he could not obtain his grandfather's permission until July
1776, when he enrolled as a six-month volunteer in a Connecticut
regiment of the Continental Army. He mustered out of the service in
December and returned home. In April 1777, Martin again "put my name
to enlisting indentures" (41). This final enlistment was for three
years, or the duration of the war.
Martin's memoir, published anonymously in 1830
and written on the basis of notes taken during the war, was
fulsomely titled Narrative of Some of the Adventures, Dangers and
Sufferings of a Revolutionary Soldier; Interspersed with Anecdotes
or Incidents That Occurred within His Own Observation. The book is
structured as a straightforward narrative, each chapter devoted to a
year's campaign. Martin avowedly writes from the perspective of the
common soldier: "why not ... Alexander never could have conquered
the world without private soldiers" (2). With a ready and humorous
wit, he provides a fascinating window into the past. Martin's
canvass is limited to his own personal experiences and immediate
observations. The excellent notes by James Kirby Martin (hereafter,
JMK) provide historical context for the modern reader throughout;
this new edition also features an expanded introduction, revised
annotations, and new maps.
Martin's eyewitness focus gives a first-hand feel of what it is like
for soldiers who march, fight, and die with little knowledge of the
big picture. He had clear objectives in writing:
Why we were made to suffer so much in
so good and just a cause; and a note of admiration to all the world,
that an army voluntarily engaged to serve their country, when
starved, and naked, and suffering everything short of death (and
thousands even that), should be able to persevere through an eight
years war, and come off the conquerors at last (2)!
The book's final chapter offers an extended
argument for which the main narrative serves as the evidence. He
forcefully maintains that the Revolutionary War Pension Act of 1818
was a long overdue payment to the veterans for services rendered. He
observes that the Continental Army regulars never received adequate
food, clothes, or shelter, much less their monthly pay. While Martin
acknowledges the difficulty of moving supplies over winter roads, he
blames the army's "starving in detail" on "an ungrateful people who
did not care what became of us, so they could enjoy themselves while
we were keeping a cruel enemy from them" (125).
Martin's belief that the Continentals'
contributions to final victory were underappreciated (both during
the war and after) ties into the second part of his concluding
argument: the role of the militia, which performed important service
during the war: "I well know, for I have fought by their side"
(183). Nevertheless, he contends that the Continental Army was the
backbone of the Revolution. Ironically, the scholarly consensus has
caught up with the old veteran in its view of the militia as a
necessary but insufficient agent for Independence.
In his battle narratives, Martin documents how
Continental discipline was vital for ultimate victory. Immediately
following his first enlistment, Martin's regiment--5th
Connecticut--was ordered to the defense of New York City in the
summer of 1776. This regiment was a short-term unit enrolled for six
months. Its officers were without experience, their troops green as
grass. Prior to the British invasion of New York, the men received
little drilling or training. After the American defeat on Long
Island, these raw soldiers were tasked with defending the likely
landing site on Manhattan at Kip's Bay. Martin describes the
position as "nothing more than a ditch dug along on the bank of the
[East] river, with the dirt thrown out toward the water" (23). On
the morning of 15 September, British warships began bombarding the
American position, as 4,000 Hessian troops approached in rowboats
toward Martin and his 500 comrades. Expecting raw militia (as the
short-term troops were considered) to withstand the fierce cannonade
was too much; their officers ordered a retreat. The result was
complete disorder and a rout. Martin blames the lack of leadership
for this humiliation: "the men were confused, being without officers
to command them. I do not recollect of seeing a commissioned officer
from the time I left the lines … until … in the evening" (29). His
regiment did, however, fight with credit at Harlem Heights and White
Plains later in the campaign.
Martin mustered out of the 5th Connecticut in
late December 1776. The following April, he signed up for the
duration with the 8th Connecticut. The recruitment of long service
regiments was the result of the manifest failures of the short-term
units. Another problem with these semi-militia regiments was that
they obliged Washington continually to rebuild the Continental Army
while actively campaigning. Washington hoped to create a
"respectable" army based on these long-term regiments, but had to
use militia as auxiliaries throughout the war due to a chronic
shortage of Continentals.
Martin's recounting of the Monmouth and Yorktown
campaigns provides ample evidence of the value of Continental
veterans. After fighting in the battle of Germantown and the siege
of Fort Mifflin, Martin had the great fortune of not spending the
winter at Valley Forge; instead, he foraged the countryside for
desperately needed supplies. During early spring 1778, he received
his first serious training as a soldier: "I was kept constantly,
when off other duty, engaged in learning the Baron de Steuben's new
Prussian exercise; it was a continual drill" (78). He observes that
the militia could neither have endured the great hardships of Valley
Forge, nor submitted to the discipline required to create troops
capable of standing against British regulars.
Martin certainly needed his training during the
Monmouth campaign. He was transferred to the light infantry, charged
with maintaining close contact with the British in order to
reconnoiter and harass them. Soldiers recruited for the light
infantry were generally the most quick-witted and fleet-footed in
the army. In summer 1778, British General Henry Clinton found it
necessary to abandon Philadelphia and consolidate his forces in New
York City, due to the French declaration of war after the American
victory at Saratoga. The British government's concerns over its
Caribbean possessions and the security of the home islands made
suppressing the American rebellion a lower priority. This obliged
Clinton to march his army across New Jersey in order to make forces
available for duty in the Caribbean. Martin and his comrades
shadowed them every foot of the way.
The main body of Washington's army caught up with
the British outside of Monmouth, New Jersey. After General Charles
Lee famously bollixed the attack upon the British flank, Washington
took personal command of the field. With great dispatch, he organized the nearby Continental regiments (including Martin's) in
an effective defense against the British counterattack. Martin
vividly describes how the well-drilled Continentals held their
ground despite repeated British assaults:
These troops maintained their ground, till the whole force of the
enemy that could be brought to bear had charged upon them through
the fence; and after being overpowered by numbers and the platoon
officers had given orders for their several platoons to
leave the fence, they had to
force them to retreat, so eager were they to be revenged on the
invaders of their country and rights…. As soon as the troops had
left this ground the British planted their cannon upon the place and
began a violent attack upon the artillery and our detachment, but
neither could be routed. The cannonade continued for some time
without intermission, when the British pieces being mostly disabled,
they reluctantly crawled back from the height which they had
occupied and hid themselves from out sight (86).
While the battle was tactically a draw, the
British slipped away and left the field to the Continental Army. Two
years after the humiliating defeats in New York, and a year after
the loss of the capital at Philadelphia, the Continentals had scored
a moral victory at Monmouth by repelling the best that European
regulars could throw at them.
Monmouth would be the last general engagement of
the war in the north. The British believed they could easily conquer
the south due to the large numbers of Tories residing there. A
"southern strategy" would also allow a better coordination between
the North American and Caribbean campaigns. Martin spent the next
two years fighting the Tory "villains" who operated between the
American and British lines around New York City. In 1780, he was
selected to serve in the Corps of Sappers and Miners. The purpose of
this small, new unit was to supervise the erection of field works.
As JKM states in a footnote, the choice of Martin for this post
demonstrates the high regard of his superior officers.
With General Cornwallis cornered at Yorktown and
a French fleet available to keep him there, Martin and his comrades
marched down to the head of the Chesapeake and boarded ship for
Virginia. On the evenings of 5 and 6 October, the sappers laid out
and supervised the building of the American siege works around
Yorktown. On the 14th, they led an assault on the British Redoubt
#10. Their orders were to clear an avenue of approach through the
British abatis with axes. As Martin relates, the sappers quickly
cleared a route through the obstructions, and the assault troops
took the fort while suffering nine killed and thirty-one wounded
(154-5). On the 17th, Cornwallis sent an officer through the lines
under a flag of truce to negotiate terms for his doomed army.
The hardships the Continentals suffered for an
ungrateful nation do not need belaboring. Suffice it to note that
about a quarter of the approximately 11,000 soldiers who went into
winter quarters at Valley Forge did not live to see the spring. On
this score, Martin sounds bitter in defending the small pensions
authorized in 1818:
The truth was, none cared for them; the country was served, and
faithfully served, and that was all that was deemed necessary. It
was, soldiers, look to yourselves, we want no more of you. I hope I
shall one day find land enough to lay my bones in. If I chance to
die in a civilized country, none will deny me that. A dead body
never begs a grave; thanks for that (179-80).
Martin alludes here to the 100-acre farms promised to
the veterans--land that never materialized for most of them.
The question remains then, why did Martin and his
Continental comrades suffer the tortures of the damned when far
easier service was available in the militia? Historian John Shy
cites the research of John Resch and Walter Sargent in which "we see
much of the old legend confirmed, or most Americans fighting for
their independence…."[1]
Martin's memoir substantiates this judgment: he was certainly not
fighting for a promised, but largely non-existent, salary of $6.75 a
month.
Martin's motives for enduring the long years of
war and privation were patriotism, loyalty to his comrades, and a
loathing of the enemy. Nowhere does he better explain his reasons
for sticking with the Continentals than in his recollection of the
mutiny of the Connecticut line in May 1780. That winter was the most
difficult of the war, due mainly to the complete collapse of the
American supply effort. The problem was financial, as farmers and
merchants would not accept worthless Continental paper currency as
payment for desperately needed supplies. The soldiers starved and
froze in near nakedness: "[a]s a result, Washington's army encamped
at Morristown, New Jersey, nearly ... disbanded in the winter of
1780."[2]
It is a measure of the soldiers' dedication that the army did not
simply melt away:
They [the mutineers] were truly patriotic; they loved their country,
and they had already suffered everything short of death in its
cause; and now, after such extreme hardships to give up all was too
much, but to starve to death was too much also .... Here was the
army starved and naked, and there their country sitting still and
expecting the army to do notable things while fainting from sheer
starvation .... We were unwilling to desert the cause of our
country, when in distress; that we knew her cause involved our own
(122, 125).
Martin stresses that the cause and the army were
one: had the army disintegrated, the cause would have been lost.
Fortunately, it did not come down to "starve to death or break up
the army," although the troops did engage in an even more dangerous
mutiny the following winter (122).
Martin's Narrative has long been
recognized as the classic soldier's memoir of the Revolutionary War.
JKM's excellent editing and notes should make Ordinary Courage
the standard edition. I highly recommend it for scholars,
students, and interested citizens.
Each chapter of the book begins with a verse
epigram by Martin. It seems fitting to give the old veteran the last
word with his prelude to the campaign of 1781, on what made all the
hardship worthwhile:
I saw the
plundering British bands
Invade the
fair Virginian lands.
I saw
great Washington advance
With
Americans and troops of France;
I saw the
haughty Britons yield
And stack
their muskets on the field.
Kansas State University
grantj@ksu.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] "Introduction: Looking Backward, Looking
Forward," in War & Society in the American Revolution:
Mobilization and Home Fronts, ed. John Resch & Walter
Sargent (Dekalb: Northern Illinois U Pr, 2007) 7; see also
Resch, Suffering Soldiers: Revolutionary War Veterans, Moral
Sentiment, and Political Culture in the Early Republic
(Amherst: U Mass Pr, 1999).
[2] E. Wayne Carp, To Starve the Army at
Pleasure (Chapel Hill: U North Carolina Pr, 1984) 72.
|